<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Negotiation on Shafiq Alibhai</title>
    <link>https://www.shafiq.in/tags/negotiation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Negotiation on Shafiq Alibhai</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <copyright>2009-2026 All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:33:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.shafiq.in/tags/negotiation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The one thing that changed how I negotiate</title>
      <link>https://www.shafiq.in/blog/the-one-thing-that-changed-how-i-negotiate/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.shafiq.in/blog/the-one-thing-that-changed-how-i-negotiate/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I used to think negotiation was about persuasion. About having the right words, the right tone, the right strategy. Turns out I was missing the whole point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s a concept from negotiation theory called BATNA — Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. It sounds academic, but it&amp;rsquo;s actually the single most practical thing you can know before walking into any discussion where two people want different things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Your BATNA is what you&amp;rsquo;d actually do if the talks fall apart. Not what you hope for. Not what sounds good in your head. What you&amp;rsquo;d realistically do tomorrow morning when nothing has been agreed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
