<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Macos on Shafiq Alibhai</title>
    <link>https://www.shafiq.in/categories/macos/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Macos on Shafiq Alibhai</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <copyright>© 2009-2026 All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 22:06:39 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.shafiq.in/categories/macos/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Homebrew has outsourced its gatekeeping to Apple</title>
      <link>https://www.shafiq.in/blog/homebrew-has-outsourced-its-gatekeeping-to-apple/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 22:06:39 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.shafiq.in/blog/homebrew-has-outsourced-its-gatekeeping-to-apple/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the casks that disappeared from Homebrew in the last couple of years didn&amp;rsquo;t go because the software was bad. They went because the author hadn&amp;rsquo;t paid Apple.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That&amp;rsquo;s not how anyone phrases it. The PR says the cask failed &lt;code&gt;brew audit&lt;/code&gt;. The audit says the binary is unsigned, or signed but not notarised, or signed by a Developer ID that doesn&amp;rsquo;t match the bundle. The deprecation policy gives the cask a sunset date. From the outside the chain looks like quality control. From the maintainer&amp;rsquo;s side it&amp;rsquo;s a $99-a-year invoice from Cupertino.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
